Cases 1 - 10 of 259
Lanier v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jason Tillery and Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Correctional Medical Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henson v. Hall
as 1:2022cv01275
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Henson
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hininger, Dr. Yvoune Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hininger, Yvonne Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hininger, Yvonne Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
Steven Dupree, Eugene Sapp, Warden Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Defendant:
CHIEF UNIT MANGER STEVEN DUPREE, UNIT MANAGER EUGENE SAPP, WARDEN HILTON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Hall et al
as 1:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Roger Reed
Defendant:
Warden Hilton Hall and FNU Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
