Cases 41 - 50 of 51
USA v. Hinton et al
as 1:2010cv00178
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Dan Hinton and Colorado POS Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Hinton v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Hinton
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hinton v. Dennis, et al
as 09-5130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL L. HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DENNIS, JOE SAM VASSAR, DAVID MARTIN and others
Ward v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Ward
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of, Oklahoma City, City of, Travis Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparkman v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2009cv00743
Plaintiff:
Christina Sparkman
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of, Oklahoma City, City of, Travis Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton v. Dennis et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Hinton
Defendant:
James Dennis, Joe S Vassar, David N Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales et al v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Gonzales, Velma Henderson, Estevan Herrera and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonzales et al v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Gonzales, Danny A. Gonzales, Danny A. Gonzales and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
