Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Young v. Lewis et al
as 6:2026cv02605
Plaintiff:
Derrick Young
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Harry McConnell and Joshua Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Phillip Reeves v. Douglas Richardson
as 26-6383
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP CHARLES REEVES, a/k/a Light Bulb
Defendant:
DOUGLAS RICHARDSON, MICHAEL CALLISON, HOBART LEWIS and others
Ackerman v. Lewis
as 6:2026cv01164
Plaintiff:
Miles Justin Ackerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobart Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Hobart Lewis
as 26-6264
Plaintiff:
WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.
Defendant:
HOBART LEWIS
Stoltie v. Lewis et al
as 6:2026cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brian Joseph Stoltie
Defendant:
Hobart Lewis, Greenville, County of, Israel Hollister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Camacho v. Lewis et al
as 1:2026cv00019
Petitioner:
Michael Camacho
Respondent:
Hobart Lewis, Cindy Crick and Perry Gravely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cade v. Giesler et al
as 6:2026cv00011
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Cade
Defendant:
M.P. Giesler, F. K. Bowdoin, Judge Shanese Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Campbell v. Greenville County Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2025cv14033
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Campbell
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriffs Office, Hobart Lewis, Deputy Randall Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Lewallen v. The County of Greenville et al
as 6:2025cv13973
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Lewallen and Christopher Craigo Lewallen
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, County of Greenville, Hobart Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Argueta v. Noone et al
as 6:2025cv13966
Plaintiff:
Jose Martin Argueta
Defendant:
Lehi J Noone, Letonya T. Simmons, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
