Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jane Doe v. Redeemer Health, et al
as 23-2866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant / Appellant:
REDEEMER HEALTH and HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEMS
DOE v. REDEEMER HEALTH et al
as 2:2023cv02405
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
REDEEMER HEALTH and HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
BERG v. HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEMS
as 3:2019cv14730
Defendant:
HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEMS
Plaintiff:
DIANE BERG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORT SANDERS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv01155
Plaintiff:
CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES - IOWA, CORP., CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MEDICAL CENTER, LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADCARE HOSPITAL OF WORCESTER, INC. et al v. WRIGHT
as 1:2017cv01896
Plaintiff:
ADCARE HOSPITAL OF WORCESTER, INC. , ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK , ARIA HEALTH and others
Defendant:
DONALD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
