Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Kebb Management, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2014cv13860
Plaintiff:
Kebb Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2014cv13844
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv13292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12183
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lydon, et al v The Dow Chemical CO.,et.al.
as 1:2013cv11932
Plaintiff:
Carol Lydon , James Lydon , S. L. and others
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Co. and Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv30173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Willliams v. Techtronic Industries of North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11502
Plaintiff:
Craig Willliams
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries of North America, Inc. , Ryobi North America and Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guerrero et al v. One World Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11500
Plaintiff:
Hector Guerrero and Eva Osorio
Defendant:
One World Technologies, Inc. and Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boulay v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11052
Plaintiff:
Gerald Boulay
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd., One World Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
