Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Valentine v. Compass Minerals International, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
John Valentine
Defendant:
Compass Minerals International, Inc., Kevin S. Crutchfield, Edward C. Dowling, Jr. and others
Hood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2021cv01016
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Stacy Hood
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hood v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2020cv02499
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hood
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gonzales (ID 54616) v. Hood et al
as 5:2019cv03099
Defendant:
Louis A. Podrebarac, (fnu) (lnu) (3), A. S. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenhardt v. City of Mankato, Kansas, et al
as 5:2018cv04151
Defendant:
Mankato, Kansas, City of, Paul Bohnert, Chris Rhea and others
Plaintiff:
Ursula Lenhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Danner v. Quality Health Care, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv04026
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathleen Danner
Defendant:
Quality Health Care, Inc., Hood Memorial Hospital, Sumner Regional Medical Center and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hood v. Roberts et al
as 5:2010cv03110
Petitioner:
Clifford Hood
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wedel v. Knobbe et al
as 6:2010cv01156
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ray Wedel
Defendant:
Kyler G. Knobbe, Wayne L. Wedel, Elva Bach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
