Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Salerno et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2018cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dolly Salerno, Robert Salerno and Diane Amantia
Defendant:
City of Niagara Falls, Niagara Falls Water Board, Occidental Petroleum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooker v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv06415
Plaintiff:
Mary Jeanene Hooker
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hooker v. Portfolio Recovery
as 1:2015cv00572
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hooker
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marquez v. Hooker et al
as 1:2014cv04167
Plaintiff:
Nilsa Marquez
Defendant:
Monroe Lee Hooker and Rhodes Farms & Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hooker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Hooker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hooker v. The United States Of America
as 1:2011cv02840
Plaintiff:
Caleb Jamel Hooker
Defendant:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
International Bottled Water Association et al v. Paterson et al
as 1:2009cv04672
Plaintiff:
International Bottled Water Association, International Bottled Water Association, International Bottled Water Association and others
Defendant:
David A. Paterson, Andrew M. Cuomo, Alexander B. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Hooker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv01085
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hooker
Defendant:
City of New York, Liza M. Dupont, Rice and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
