Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Travis Weston v. John Baldwin, et al
as 23-2804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS D. WESTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, FRANK LAWRENCE and others
Marlon Watford v. Howard Harner, et al
as 22-1673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON L. WATFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD HARNER, JIM WINTERS, Food Supervisor, ROGER KERN and others
Travis Weston v. John Baldwin, et al
as 20-2642
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Chief Administrative Officer/Warden, Menard CC, LLOYD HANNA, Registered Dietician, Menard CC, HOWARD HARNER, Licensed and/or Ordained Chaplain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS D. WESTON, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, also known as Nafiabdul Basir
Weston v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv01020
Plaintiff:
Travis Weston and Nafiabdul Basir
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Lloyd Hanna, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv00268
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, John Doe #11, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Howard Harner, Stephen C. Keim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline A. Lashbrook, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Harner et al
as 3:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Omar Ashanti Johnson
Defendant:
Howard Harner, Kimberly Butler, Steve Keim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Stephen Keim, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dowdy et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Dowdy, Lt. Hughes, Luehr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
