Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 21-1083
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKEY J. COLEMAN, GINA COUTURIER, HOWARD TYREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chris Webber v. Howard Tyree, et al
as 10-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WEBBER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD TYREE, M.S.P. at Baraga Maximum Correctional Facility, all in their Individual, Personal, and Official Capacities
Gordon #308075 v. Tribley et al
as 2:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Deontae Gordon #308075
Defendant:
Linda Tribley, Gloria Hill, Howard Tyree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Haynes v. Keith Ivens, et al
as 10-1240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY M. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH IVENS, JEFFREY STIEVE, JOHN DOES and others
Haynes v. Ivens et al
as 2:2008cv13091
Plaintiff:
Randy Haynes
Defendant:
Keith Ivens , Jeffrey Stieve , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Webber #243057 v. Tyree et al
as 2:2009cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chris Webber #243057
Defendant:
Howard Tyree, Clara Chosa, Kenneth J. Codere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson #137377 v. Engelsgjerd et al
as 2:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Johnson #137377
Defendant:
Michael Engelsgjerd, Harish Rawal and Howard Tyree
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Topham v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv10577
Plaintiff:
Brad Topham
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Terry Hallory, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
