Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc., et al v. Stryker Corporation
as 5:2018cv01557
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Waber and Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Bruce
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as HOC Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerry Sides v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv03359
Defendant:
Does, Howmedica Osteonics Corp, Charles Moon, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Sides
Kerry Sides v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01170
Defendant:
Does, Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Charles Moon and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Sides
Davison v. Stryker Orthopedics, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00240
Defendant:
Stryker Orthopedics, Inc., Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp, d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics et al
as 2:2017cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert Hanson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Stryker Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Paciolla et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 5:2017cv01767
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Paciolla and Jamie Paciolla
Larry R. Schneider v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 8:2017cv01286
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Plaintiff:
Larry R Schneider
Palmer et al v. Stryker, Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Richard D Palmer and Joyce Palmer
Defendant:
Stryker, Orthopedics, Inc. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joyce Ulrich v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv04175
Defendant:
Does, Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ulrich
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
