Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Jeff R. v. United Behavioral Health et al
as 4:2019cv03694
Defendant:
HP Inc., Does 1 through 10, HP Inc. Mental/Substance Use Disorder PPO Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff R.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Goodman v. HP Inc.
as 3:2019cv02973
Defendant:
HP Inc.
Plaintiff:
James B. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hicks v. HP Inc.
as 3:2019cv02050
Defendant:
HP Inc.
Plaintiff:
Louis Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PC Coma LLC v. HP Inc.
as 4:2019cv00989
Defendant:
HP Inc.
Plaintiff:
PC Coma LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
as 5:2018cv06146
Undetermined:
Scott Woloson
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cypress Lake Software, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
HP Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. HP Inc.
as 5:2018cv06144
Defendant:
HP Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cypress Lake Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. HP Inc.
as 3:2018cv04032
Defendant:
HP Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BKK Working Group et al v. Albertsons Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05836
Plaintiff:
Rohr, Inc., Univar USA Inc., Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Defendant:
Ciba Geigy Corp., Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Friction Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Barry Wright Controls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01199
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
Defendant:
Agilent Technologies, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
