Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Debra Kirktindoll, et al v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al
as 14-12021
Intervenor - Appellant:
DEBRA KIRKTINDOLL, TIMOTHY BROOKS, JEAN FRANCIOS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAVIER LOPEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and DARLENE DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC BANK USA, NA, HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ASSURANT, INC. and others
Debra Kirktindoll, et al v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al
as 14-12021
Defendant / Appellee:
HSBC BANK USA, NA, ASSURANT, INC., AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE CO. and others
Intervenor:
PATRICIA DEHAERNE, MARK WAKEFIELD, ROBERT STREICH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARLENE DIAZ and JAVIER LOPEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Brady v. HSBC Bank,USA, NA
as 1:2014cv01329
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brady
Defendant:
HSBC Bank,USA, NA
SCOTT v. HSBC BANK USA NA
as 4:2014mc00003
Plaintiff:
BETTY CECILIA SCOTT
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA NA
Muhammad v. HSBC Bank USA, NA et al
as 1:2013cv00617
Plaintiff:
Bernice Muhammad
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, NA, Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investore Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabuteau v. HSBC Bank USA, NA
as 1:2013cv24485
Plaintiff:
Ernst Tabuteau
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53
HSBC Bank USA, NA v. Rashid
as 1:2013cv03800
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, NA
Defendant:
Hassan M. Rashid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
JONES v. HSBC BANK USA NA
as 1:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
AMY H JONES
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BELL v. HSBC BANK USA NA
as 1:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
SHERRI BELL
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Williams v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
Nyrevere Williams
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA , HSBC Bank, USA, NA , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
