Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Yergler et al v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2023cv01545
Plaintiff: Samuel Yergler and Nicholas Hollows
Defendant: City of Eugene, Eric Eason, Eric Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Hubbard v. Oregon Youth Authority
as 6:2019cv01797
Petitioner: Justin Hubbard
Respondent: Oregon Youth Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv01640
Defendant: City of Eugene, Faith McCready, Timothy Hunt and others
Plaintiff: Edgar T. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Amsberry
as 2:2018cv00763
Respondent: Bridgitte Amsberry
Petitioner: Christopher Ted Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubbard v. Gardner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00450
Defendant: Farmers Insurance Company, Alvin Gardner and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff: Robert G. Hubbard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hubbard v. USA
as 3:2016cv01157
Petitioner: Dwayne Jamal Hubbard
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hubbard v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00032
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Randy D. Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?