Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adeline Ricks v. DOWCP and Huntington Ingall
as 15-2478
Petitioner:
ADELINE COTTON RICKS
Respondent:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lee v. Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company et al
as 4:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Larry Winslowe Lee
Defendant:
Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company , Huntington Ingalls Incorporated and Huntington Ingalls Industries , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Huntington Ingalls Industries v. Ricky Eason
as 14-1698
Petitioner:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED, f/k/a Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/a Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated
Respondent:
RICKY N. EASON and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
