Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Steven Young v. DOWCP
as 24-1299
Petitioner:
STEVEN T. YOUNG
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Scharpf et al v. General Dynamics Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
Susan Scharpf and Anthony D'Armiento
Defendant:
General Dynamics Corp., Bath Iron Works Corp., Electric Boat Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Shiloh v. DOWCP
as 23-1846
Petitioner:
SHILOH
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Shiloh v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
as 23-1422
Petitioner:
SHILOH
Respondent:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
USA, ex rel Joseph Odish, et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, et al
as 19-1693
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ELLISON, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., LARRY PAGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ODISH and CRANBROOK CAPITAL CONSULTING GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Adeline Ricks v. DOWCP and Huntington Ingall
as 15-2478
Petitioner:
ADELINE COTTON RICKS
Respondent:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Huntington Ingalls Industries v. Ricky Eason
as 14-1698
Petitioner:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED, f/k/a Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/a Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated
Respondent:
RICKY N. EASON and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bradshaw v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:11-CV-00520
Plaintiff:
Bradshaw
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
