Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Edward Thomas v. On Habeas Corpus
as 2:2024cv06816
Petitioner:
Edward Thomas
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thomas v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Herrera v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00879
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Johnny Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Kifah v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00856
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Ihab Nadhim Kifah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Bolin v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(DP) Vieira v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Richard John Vieira
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
(HC) Welton v. Phillips
as 2:2023cv01325
Petitioner:
Robert Welton
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus and Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McGuire v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Moses P. McGuire
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Walter Lewis Smith v. On Habeas Corpus
as 5:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Kenneth Walter Louis Smith
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Smith v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Kenneth Walter Louis Smith
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
