Cases 1 - 10 of 57
McSean v. Chamberlain et al
as 4:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Kelly La Gale McSean
Defendant:
Chris Chamberlain, Jeff Cunningham, Misty Kindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strutton et al v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Strutton and James Moller
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, Christopher Chamberlain, George Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Reitz et al
as 4:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Cory R. Ballard
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Reitz and Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aufderheide v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv01026
Petitioner:
Joan L. Aufderheide
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Locke v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Locke
Defendant:
Denease Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv00951
Petitioner:
Daniel Kennemore
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. McGee
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. Hacker et al
as 2:2023cv04141
Petitioner:
Dean Davidson and Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
Denise Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McSean v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, George Killian, William Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Vincenz et al
as 4:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Kevin McGee
Defendant:
Felix Vincenz, Denise Hacker and MO Dept. of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
