Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05858
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05824
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05537
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05549
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05526
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Winspear et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2026cv12100
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Winspear, Blaise Aguirre, John Bair and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05289
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05176
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hagans v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv04110
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation formerly doing business as FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hagans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
HAGAN v. WARDEN
as 1:2026cv02218
Petitioner:
ISAIAH ALBERT HAGAN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
