Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Haines v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv23640
Plaintiff:
Lorine Elizabeth Haines
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines v. USA
as 3:2014cv00033
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Daniel Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gemcraft Homes, Inc. v. Morgan et al
as 3:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Gemcraft Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
George Morgan, Jr. , Michelle Morgan , David Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Haines v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv31766
Plaintiff:
Carol Haines
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25829
Plaintiff:
Nancy Haines
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24832
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Haines and Douglas C. Haines
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines et al v. Pinnacle Wind, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Haines and Gail M. Haines
Defendant:
Pinnacle Wind, LLC and Mission Wind Pinnacle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv09573
Plaintiff:
Doreen L. Haines
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haines v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01278
Plaintiff:
Joan Haines
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haines v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv09420
Plaintiff:
Ora Haines
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
