Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Rollins v. Hale et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
James B. Rollins
Defendant:
Kristi Hale, Kieryn Fannin, Jennifer Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Billy Hale
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Washington v. Hale
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
David Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watkins v. Hale
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
GeneDeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hicks v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hicks
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale, Judge Benjamin Beaton, Judge Claria Horn Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hale v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nikki La'Dana Hale
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hale v. Bell Co. Jailer et al
as 3:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Hale
Defendant:
Bell Co. Jailer and Gary Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Angela Paige Fisher
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, Department of Community Based Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Atkins v. Stivers et al
as 3:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Defendant:
Chief District Judge Greg N. Stivers, District Judge David J. Hale, District Judge Claria H. Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
