Cases 21 - 30 of 267
Cheeks v. Hamilton
as 7:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Cheeks
Defendant:
Israel D. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. USA
as 1:2023cv01340
Petitioner:
Andre Emelio Hamilton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Howard v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Eric Howard
Defendant:
Warden I. Hamilton, Unit Manager J. Collins, Director of Nursing A. E. Whitted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Deon Carter
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton and D. Squire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 7:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reece v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Heather Reece
Defendant:
Bank of America, Bank of America, N.A.,, BAC Home Loans Servicing, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ferguson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ansaro Ferguson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Israel Hamilton, Mr. Hankins, Mr. Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, Bernard Morris, Lyons Sanchezconcha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Bradburn et al
as 7:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Banks
Defendant:
CO Bradburn, CO Smallwood, CO Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
