Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cinti Dev III, LLC v. Cinti Terrace Plaza, LLC, et al
as 22-3367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CINCINNATI DEVELOPMENT III, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
CINCINNATI TERRACE PLAZA, LLC
Defendant:
CINCINNATI TERRACE MEMBER, LLC, HAMILTON COUNTY RECORDER NORBERT A. NADEL, JOHN DOES 1 - 8 and others
Cinti Dev III, LLC v. Cinti Terrace Plaza, LLC, et al
as 22-3303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CINCINNATI DEVELOPMENT III, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
CINCINNATI TERRACE PLAZA, LLC
Defendant:
CINCINNATI TERRACE MEMBER, LLC, HAMILTON COUNTY RECORDER NORBERT A. NADEL, JOHN DOES 1 - 8 and others
Riddle v. Hamilton County Recorder et al
as 1:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Summit County Domestic Relations Court, Wells Fargo Bank, 9th District Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cincinnati Development III, LLC v. Cincinnati Terrace Plaza, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00586
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Development III, LLC
Defendant:
Cincinnati Terrace Member, LLC, norbert nadel, Cincinnati Terrace Plaza, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darryl Mason v. Adams County Recorder, et al
as 17-3605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL O. MASON
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS COUNTY RECORDER, ALLEN COUNTY RECORDER, ASHLAND COUNTY RECORDER and others
Mason v. Adams County Recorder et al
as 1:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Darryl O. Mason
Defendant:
Adams County Recorder , Allen County Recorder , Ashland County Recorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raymond Pratt v. State of Ohio, et al
as 15-4115
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND PRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR, HAMILTON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE and others
Doe et al v. Adams County Recorder et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Adams County Recorder , Allen County Recorder , Ashland County Recorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
