Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sundari Prasad v. Hamilton Hendrix, et al
as 20-7069
Defendant / Appellee:
Hamilton L. Hendrix, Dana Parton, "Masumi Max", Monica K. Vick Hendrix and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sundari K. Prasad, also known as Sun Karma
Sundari Prasad v. Jayne Pemberton
as 19-7732
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMILTON L. HENDRIX, CAROLYN D. NELSON, SHAWN LEWIS-PAUES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Prasad v. Cheek et al
as 3:2019cv00371
Defendant:
Hamilton L. Hendrix, Viviene B. Cheek and Carolyn D. Nelson
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE et al
as 1:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant:
STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE, JASON ROOP, MELISSA SCOTT SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Locke et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Richard Locke, Stephen Bloomquest and Hamilton L. Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI KARMA PRASAD
Defendant:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., BEVERLY EVANS SMITH, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. James-Woods et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Jody James-Woods, The People and Hamilton L. Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundari Prasad v. Hamilton Hendrix
as 17-7483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMILTON L. HENDRIX, GLORIA DALE LEWIS-SORRELL, JAMES SORRELL and others
Sundari Prasad v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 17-7224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, CAROLYN D. NELSON, VIVIENE B. CHEEK and others
Prasad v. Mi Boca Latina et al
as 3:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Mi Boca Latina, Donald Agegunwa, Hamilton L. Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
