Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Hammond v. Firman
as 16-1084
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD ZACHARY HAMMOND
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICK FIRMAN
Hammond v. Stob et al
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Stob, Carol Rogers, Koonce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Firman
as 1:2015cv02798
Petitioner:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Respondent:
Patrick Firman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hammond v. Pillar Properties Services, LLC
as 1:2015cv02601
Plaintiff:
G.Z. Hammond
Defendant:
Pillar Properties Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Natrona County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Andrea L Hammond
Defendant:
Natrona County Sheriff's Department, Gus Holbrook , Natrona County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winkel v. Hammond, et al
as 14-3191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. WINKEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEOFFERY HAMMOND, MD, Medical Director, Larned State Hospital, in his individual capacity, DILIP PATEL, MD, Larned State Hospital, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE, MD, Larned State Hospital, in his individual capacity, AKA (FNU) Oleachea and others
Hammond v. Beicker et al
as 1:2014cv01991
Plaintiff:
Andrea Hammond
Defendant:
Fremont County Sheriff's Office , Goodman, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkel (ID 103141) v. Hammond et al
as 5:2014cv03032
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Winkel
Defendant:
Geoffery Hammond, Dilip Patel, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. I.C.C.S. et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
Andrea Hammond
Defendant:
I.C.C.S., Department of Corrections, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkel (ID 103141) v. Hammond et al
as 5:2013cv03103
Plaintiff:
Robert Winkel
Defendant:
Geoffery Hammond, Dilip Patel, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.