Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Ishak v. Greensburg Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Akuwa Ishak
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Hammond Police Department, Edwin Bergeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2023cv06467
Plaintiff:
Lionell Jackson
Defendant:
Craig Dunn, City of Hammond and Hammond City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chumley v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Chumley
Defendant:
James David Madden, Lyda Roberts Madden, Stephen Douglas Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Watkins v. Fox et al
as 2:2021cv00856
Defendant:
City of Hammond, Louisiana, Officer John Doe 3, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrade v. Stewart et al
as 3:2020cv00886
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, Janice Lindsey, Elizabeth Taylor Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Frank Andrade
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stratis Construction, Inc. v. Hammond City, et al
as 2:2019cv12901
Defendant:
PETE PANEPINTO, city of hammond, JOSH TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
carl perkins, stratis construction and Stratis Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgewater et al v. Bergeron et al
as 2:2019cv12656
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Watson, Jr. and Erica Bridgewater
Defendant:
Officer Edwin Bergeron, City of Hammond, Officer Chester Leander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
