Cases 11 - 20 of 617
BARNETT v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
RANDY DEWAYNE BARNETT
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON and DOCTOR CARL LIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Hancock State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Barnett
Defendant:
Hancock State Prison and Dr. Carl Lift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVAS v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
PAMELA LOVAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
WASHINGTON v. HANCOCK COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
RASHONTE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torrence Sanders v. Hancock SP Warden
as 23-13885
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORRENCE SANDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN and WARDEN
Saleem Williams v. Hancock SP Warden
as 23-13787
Petitioner / Appellant:
SALEEM D. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN
PASULO v. HANCOCK WHITNEY BANK et al
as 3:2023cv24660
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PASULO
Defendant:
HANCOCK WHITNEY BANK, CHRISTOPHER ESTRADE, FATULA SLAUGHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HANCOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31258
Plaintiff:
JAMES HANCOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HANCOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32663
Plaintiff:
SAMPSON HANCOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HANCOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34156
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HANCOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
