Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Abney v. Stewart et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Robert Calvin Abney
Defendant:
Clay Stewart and Lt. Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Rudd et al
as 1:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
Judith Elaine Petty
Defendant:
John Rudd , Johnson & Freedman, LLC and Hancock Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maclay Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2012mc03598
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Maclay Construction, Inc. and Charles A. Maclay
Garnishee:
Regions Bank and Hancock Bank
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Hancock Bank v. Triple B Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Triple B Investments, LLC , Adrian J. Beach , Robert M. Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock Bank v. Elite Development, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Elite Development, LLC, Clarence E. Burke, Jr., John B. Foley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Wolfe Jones Wolfe Hancock & Daniel LLC
as 5:2011cv01441
Plaintiff:
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Wolfe Jones Wolfe Hancock & Daniel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robbins v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2011cv01177
Plaintiff:
Jason Heath Robbins
Defendant:
State of Alabama, City of Huntsville, Huntsville City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hancock Bank v. Bon Secour Ventures, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00767
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Bon Secour Ventures, LLC, Peter R. Morris, PRM Realty Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
