Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Yauger, Jr. v. Greene County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Benny Earl Yauger, Jr.
Defendant:
Greene County Jail, Greene County Sheriffs Office, Sheriff Jonathan Benison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Young v. Rashaun Robinson, et al
as 24-10210
Plaintiff:
ALBERT DEMETRIUS YOUNG
Defendant:
RASHAUN ROBINSON, SARAFINO LOVETTO, GABRIEL BROOKS and others
JACKSON v. TOMLINSON et al
as 7:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LAKEITH JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAYTON TOMLINSON, GWEN ROBERTSON, SHERIFF DOUG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yauger, Jr. v. Greene County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Benny Earl Younger, Sr. and Benny Earl Yauger, Jr
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriffs Office, Greene County Jail, Advanced Correctional Health Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Kane et al
as 4:2022cv10064
Plaintiff:
Rory Hank Wilson
Defendant:
Robert Kane and Rick Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Spurlock et al
as 2:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Albert D Young
Defendant:
Dewayne Spurlock, Cliff Walker, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Defendant:
DREW, GREEN, HUBBARD and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
REEDER, HANKS, GEO GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senatus v. Lopez et al
as 0:2020cv62219
Defendant:
Hank R. Juntunen, Gerardo Lopez, Anthony Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Pender Senatus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 5:2020cv00287
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, REEDER, DREW and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
