Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 75
MASSEY v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00481
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: CLIFTON T. MASSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASSEY v. HANKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00482
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: CLIFTON T. MASSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALONE v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00358
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: LAVELLE MALONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. HANK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00357
Petitioner: LEROY H. HALL
Respondent: CRAIG HANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FOOTE v. HANKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00336
Petitioner: GEORGE A. FOOTE, Jr.
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GLASCO v. HANKS et al
as 1:2013cv00303
Defendant: BACOTE, CONYERS, ELLIOT and others
Plaintiff: CONZALOS GLASCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDERSON v. HANKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00291
State Of Indiana: HANKS
Petitioner: SHAWN L. HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McSWAIN v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00213
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: ANTOINE McSWAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALONE v. HANK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00208
Respondent: CRAIG HANK
Petitioner: LAVELLE MALONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00207
Petitioner: KEVIN CHANDLER
Respondent: MR. HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?