Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv06488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gary S. Hann v. Royal Palms Mobile Home Park et al
as 5:2020cv00805
Plaintiff:
Gary S. Hann
Defendant:
Jarrod Vincent Whitehorn, Asset Access Management, Inc., Christine Gallaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gary S. Hann v. Karl T. Anderson et al
as 5:2020cv00756
Plaintiff:
Gary S. Hann
Defendant:
Shulman Hodges and Bastian LLP, The United States Trustee, Melissa Davis Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David J. Lashgari, et al v. William J. Bratton, et al
as 09-56289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. LASHGARI and MARJE H. LASHGARI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. BRATTON, LAPD, Chief, J NICHOLSON, JOHN LEBERKNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN ERDERT, JOHN FERRIS, STEVE COOLEY and others
Clark v. Hann et al
as 2:2009cv01452
Plaintiff:
Peter J.D. Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Hann, Rick Brazeil, Sacramento Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Walker, et al v. San Diego City Of, et al
as 3:1997cv01547
Plaintiff:
Beverly Walker , Wheelchair Access Now Today , Robert Hann and others
Defendant:
San Diego City Of , Ace Parking , DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
