Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Hann v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department
as 2:2011cv03368
Plaintiff:
Evan Hann
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hann v. State of California
as 2:2011cv03354
Petitioner:
Evan Hann
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calhoun v. San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners et al
as 3:2010cv01409
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners, W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr, VAMC San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego County, et al.
as 3:2010cv00965
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, San Diego Sheriff Department, Hanns Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00522
Defendant:
San Diego County, William V. Gallo, Dana M. Sabraw and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Judge Whelan, Judge Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diallo Uhuru v. P. Hart, et al
as 09-56879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIALLO E. UHURU, Min.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. HART, J. JOSLYN, D. ENGLER and others
Defendant:
N. GRANNIS
David J. Lashgari, et al v. William J. Bratton, et al
as 09-56289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. LASHGARI and MARJE H. LASHGARI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. BRATTON, LAPD, Chief, J NICHOLSON, JOHN LEBERKNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN ERDERT, JOHN FERRIS, STEVE COOLEY and others
Clark v. Hann et al
as 2:2009cv01452
Plaintiff:
Peter J.D. Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Hann, Rick Brazeil, Sacramento Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
