Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Hansen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03243
Plaintiff:
David Hansen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Celanese International Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01573
Plaintiff:
Rickie G. Smith
Defendant:
Celanese International Corporation, CHR. Hansen, Inc., Givaudan Flavors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hansen et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
M.D. Kendall E. Hansen and Interventional Pain Specialists, PLC
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03528
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barbara S Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01055
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Danny Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00806
Plaintiff:
Stacy Hansen and Richard Hansen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02292
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hansen and Vicki Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05214
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hansen Josephine and Josephine Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez et al v. Monster Beverage Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00462
Defendant:
Energy Beverages, LLC, Monster Beverage Corporation, Hansen Beverage Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Martinez and Desiree Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
