Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BOYLE
as 2:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KERRI HANSEN
Defendant:
EDMUND N. BOYLE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
DATASCOPE ANALYTICS, LLC et al v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 2:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
DATASCOPE ANALYTICS, LLC , HANSEN IP LAW, PLLC and ROBBIE SIMMONS
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BUCK et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv06449
Plaintiff:
JASON OGDEN BUCK , BRIAN HANSEN , LAURIE HANSEN and others
Defendant:
ROXI BUCK , NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HANSEN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv06387
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA HANSEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 200
HANSEN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv01377
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. HANSEN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
AMERICAN DRIVELINE CENTERS, INC. et al v. HANSEN
as 2:2012cv05280
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN DRIVELINE CENTERS, INC. and AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
GERALD H. HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANSEN v. JORDAN et al
as 3:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
CHERYL L. HANSEN
Defendant:
BILLY JORDAN, JR. , THE JORDAN INSURANCE AGENCY and TIME INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
