Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv02830
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. True, Harley Lappin and others
Petitioner:
David Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 13-1164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director B.O.P., MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director B.O.P. and RON WILEY, Warden ADX Supermax
Al-Amin v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv02171
Plaintiff:
Jamil A. Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkabile, M. Munson, Blake Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nantambu v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2012cv02037
Plaintiff:
Damani Muata Nantambu
Defendant:
B.O.P. , Harley Lappin , Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01826
Petitioner:
Khalifa Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, Becky Bile, Chrss and others
Defendant:
Gonzelez and Finne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kirby v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01703
Petitioner:
Damian M. Kirby
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Still v. Herndon, et al
as 11-1463
Petitioner - Appellant:
MINOR MICHAEL STILL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY HERNDON, Administrative Service, U.S. Marshall, Colorado, KEN DEAL, Deputy United States Marshal, Colorado and HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Stine v. Allred
as 11-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ALLRED, Mr. Clinical Director ADX
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, BOP, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, Regional Dir. BOP N.O. Region and others
Doll v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv01496
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Doll
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Rene Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Broches v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv01358
Petitioner:
George D. Broches
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Rene Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
