Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Pinson v. Pacheco, et al
as 11-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PACHECO, SARA REVELL, MERRY WILNER and others
Miller v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv01190
Plaintiff:
Nick Miller
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv01167
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Davis, Chris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Ballesteros v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00783
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramon Matta Lopez-Ballesteros
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, John Rathman, Blake Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pinson v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, DELBERT SAVERS and SARA REVELL
Allmon v. Lappin et al.
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Derek Isaac Allmon
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Blake Davis, Deborah Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleh, et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-1072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED SALEH, EL-SAYYID NOSAIR and IBRAHIM ELGABROWNY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Radick v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RADICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, F.B.O.P., MIKE NALLEY, Regional Director, F.B.O.P., N. FIELDS, Administrative Remedy Coordinator North Central Regional Office and others
Guthrie v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Norman D. Guthrie
Defendant:
USA, Harley Lappin and Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
