Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Still v. Herndon et al
as 1:2009cv01326
Petitioner:
Minor Michael Still
Respondent:
Mary Herndon, Ken Deal and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stanko v. Quay, et al
as 09-1214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDY STANKO
Defendant - Appellee:
HERMAN QUAY, local director, MICHAEL NALLEY, regional director and HARLEY LAPPIN, national director
In re: Zebedee Hall, et al
as 09-3114
Petitioner:
ZEBEDEE HALL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Stanko v. Quay, et al
as 09-1159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDY STANKO
Defendant - Appellee:
HERMAN QUAY, Local Director, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director and HARLEY LAPPIN, National Director
Higgins v. Lappin
as 1:2009cv00661
Petitioner:
Michael J. Higgins
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stanko v. Davis, et al
as 09-1104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDY STANKO
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Warden, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director, HARLEY LAPPIN, individually and in his official capacity as Director and others
Nichols v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Nichols
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv03052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stanko v. Quay et al
as 1:2009cv00371
Petitioner:
Rudy Stanko
Respondent:
Herman Quay, Michael Nalley and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Trujillo v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv00328
Petitioner:
Angelo Trujillo
Respondent:
Blake Davis and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
