Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Okpala v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John B. Fox, Constanle Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fitch v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00431
Petitioner:
David Kent Fitch
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ v. LAPPIN
as 1:2009cv00079
Petitioner:
Domingo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RODRIGUEZ v. LAPPIN
as 3:2009cv00871
Petitioner:
Domingo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Murray v. Battles et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Petitioner:
Greg Murray
Respondent:
S. Battles, G. Maldonado, Jr., B. A. Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Downs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Petitioner:
John Wentzell Downs
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and John Fox
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Patel v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
Kamal K Patel
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flowers v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00653
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Flowers
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Gene Malanando, Greg Hershberger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2008cv00634
Petitioner:
RENARD DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
