Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cuara R. v. Associated Food Stores et al
as 2:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Associated Food Stores, Costco Wholesale Corporation, Sams Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. Goble et al
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Raymond Max Snyder
Defendant:
Alex Goble, American Family Insurance, Stewart Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Nelson
as 4:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Larry Harmon
Defendant:
Shane Nelson
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Uintah Basin Medical Center et al
as 2:2020cv00669
Plaintiff:
Kevin K. Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Northeastern Counseling Center, Jason S. Beales and Uintah Basin Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd
Harmon Sr, Patrick Estate of et al v. Salt Lake City et al
as 2:2019cv00553
Plaintiff:
Tasha Smith, Harmon Sr, Patrick Estate of and Patrick Harmon
Defendant:
Clinton Fox and Salt Lake City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atherton v. Salt Lake City et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Plaintiff:
Arlene R. Atherton
Defendant:
Harmons, Salt Lake City Police Department and Salt Lake City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disney Enterprises et al v. VidAngel et al
as 2:2019mc00122
Petitioner:
Turner Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros Entertainment and others
Defendant:
VidAngel
Respondent:
Dalton Wright, Harmon Brothers, Harmon Ventures and others
Harmon v. State of Utah
as 2:2016cv01220
Plaintiff:
Larry Harmon
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Wright v. Nephi City et al
as 2:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Blake R. Wright
Defendant:
Nephi City, Milton Harmon, Juab County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
