Cases 11 - 20 of 32
HARNESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87531
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FEDEL ALFONTE HARNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARNESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87031
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA HARNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARNESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53103
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER HARNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARNESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40420
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN M HARNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARNESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08314
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE HARNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARNESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04484
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARNESS
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLDER et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03270
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GLIDDON, SAMUEL YOUNG, WOODY BULLOCK and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chisolm v. 1st Battalion 75th Regiment Employees of the US Army
as 4:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Har'rell Chisolm
Defendant:
1st Battalion 75th Regiment Employees of the US Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Chanel, Inc. v. ald Gall LNH et al
as 0:2016cv62818
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
ald Gall LNH, ALENE DAVIS, AMELIA AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hempstead v. Clark et al
as 3:2015cv00374
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Roland Clark, Cesar, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
