Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Abaray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
George Abaray, Juan Adame, Jerry Adcox and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
HARO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv18623
Plaintiff:
LAURA HARO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CROWFOOT et al
as 2:2020cv07654
Defendant:
WADE CROWFOOT, LEA HARO, MELISSA RAE KING and others
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HARO v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
as 2:2018cv12223
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
DELORES HARO
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. HARO
as 5:2012cv06315
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
BERTHA A. HARO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ABRAMS et al
as 2:2011cv01567
Defendant:
THEODORE MONGELL, DAVID SCOTT, WERNER ENTERPRISES and others
Plaintiff:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant:
HALLMARK INSURANCE CO.
Special Master:
THOMAS T. FRAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Haro Bicycle Corp, et al v. Union Ins Co, et al
as 09-1503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARO BICYCLE CORP and EVANSTON INS CO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION INS CO, CHINA MARINERS ASSURANCE CO and HDI-GERLING IND VERSICHERUNG AG
HARO BICYCLE CORPORATION et al v. UNION INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2008cv03727
Plaintiff:
HARO BICYCLE CORPORATION and EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, CHINA MARINERS ASSURANCE COMPANY, GERLING-KONZERN ALLGEMEINE VERSICHERUNGS-AG and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
