Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Harris Research v. Newell et al
as 1:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Harris Research
Defendant:
Jeffrey Newell, Jared L. Ware, JR Rugby Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Harris Research v. Fabulous Floors Franchise
as 1:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Harris Research
Defendant:
Fabulous Floors Franchise
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MYTEE PRODUCTS V HARRIS RESEARCH
as 10-1457
Defendant-Appellee:
Harris Research, Inc., Harris Research, Inc., Harris Research, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Mytee Products, Inc., Mytee Products, Inc., Mytee Products, Inc. and others
Harris Research v. England et al
as 1:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Harris Research
Defendant:
Craig England, White Glove Enterprises and Wen Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MYTEE PRODUCTS V HARRIS RESEARCH
as 10-1226
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Harris Research, Inc., Harris Research, Inc., Harris Research, Inc. and others
MYTEE PRODUCTS V HARRIS RESEARCH
as 10-1207
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Harris Research, Inc., Harris Research, Inc., Harris Research, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Mytee Products, Inc., Mytee Products, Inc., Mytee Products, Inc. and others
Harris Research v. Bailey et al
as 1:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Harris Research and Harris Research
Defendant:
Max D. Bailey, Jr., Max D. Bailey, Sr. and MDB Investments
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Harris Research, Inc. v. Mr. Sandless Franchise
as 1:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc. and Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Mr. Sandless Franchise
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
HARRIS RESEARCH, INC. v. ANTHONY PERRUSO dba CHEM-DRY
as 2:2009mc00174
Plaintiff:
HARRIS RESEARCH, INC.
Defendant:
ANTHONY PERRUSO dba CHEM-DRY
Harris et al v. Seto et al
as 7:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Harris and M. F. Harris Research Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey K. Seto, Deep Blue Inc., Kevin Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
