Cases 1 - 10 of 38
FENNELL et al v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERKLEY, KENNETH SERNOBLE, GABRIEL LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GOLDY, LIEUTENANT HENNINGER, CAPTAIN MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLYNN v. WILSON et al
as 3:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FLYNN
Defendant:
HARRY WILSON, DEPUTY SUPT. BURNS, CAPTAIN MANCHAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNY v. NEWHOUSE et al
as 2:2008cv01493
Plaintiff:
RICARDO KENNY
Defendant:
NEWHOUSE, GUTY, MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCGOLDRICK v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01165
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGOLDRICK
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and HARRY WILSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAYES v. WILSON et al
as 2:2008cv00682
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HAYES
Defendant:
HARRY WILSON, SUMMER DUGAN, MARK LEARN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. WILSON et al
as 2:2008cv00589
Plaintiff:
BRYANT DAVIS
Defendant:
HARRY WILSON, KERRI CROSS, TAMMY CESARINO-MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FORTSON v. KELCHNER et al
as 2:2008cv00532
Plaintiff:
NATHAN T. FORTSON
Defendant:
DONALD KELCHNER, HARRY WILSON, DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMM v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
ANCELL HAMM
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL, TOM CORBETT, HARRY WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. WILSON et al
as 2:2008cv01163
Petitioner:
CHARLES RUSSELL WHITFIELD, JR.
Respondent:
HARRY WILSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MICHELLE HENRY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROHN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
JAMOD-KHALIL ROHN
Defendant:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, HARRY WILSON and MR. TUGGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
