Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Saxton v. Harrison et al
as 1:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ray Saxton
Defendant:
Martha Harrison, Sam Phillips, Vicky Kristensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Postmaster General
as 3:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
Anna K. Harrison
Defendant:
Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Harrison v. Skechers, USA Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Harrison
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2011md02308
Plaintiff:
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation, Melissa Kearnely, Richard Kearnely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Isom et al v. www.isom.org
as 3:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
Mary Isom, Yvette Isom, Harrison Isom and others
Defendant:
www.isom.org
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albury et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC, et al
as 3:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Angela Albury , Cassi Allen , Katrina Allen and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc. , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. v. Pickerill et al
as 3:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
August Pickerill , Robert Crady , Bryan Sperry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Midgett v. Head Chaplain et al
as 5:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Edward Harrison Midgett
Defendant:
Head Chaplain and Tyree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stumbo v. Crews et al
as 3:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert Stumbo
Defendant:
Cookie Crews and Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
