Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Harrison v. United States
as 1:2009cv00589
Petitioner:
Rayquinshawn Harrison
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dedrick et al v. Sheriff of Columbia County et al
as 1:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Harold F. Dedrick, Sr. and Marion Dedrick
Defendant:
Sheriff of Columbia County, Sheriff David W. Harrison, Jr., Deputy Brian Molinski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Berkshire Bank v. Lombardi, Walsh, Wakeman, Harrison, Amodeo & Davenport, P.C. et al
as 1:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
Berkshire Bank and Berkshire Bank
Defendant:
Lombardi, Walsh, Wakeman, Harrison, Amodeo & Davenport, P.C., Robert G. Wakeman and Gary L. Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrison v. USA
as 1:2006cv00394
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rayquinshawn Harrison
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dedrick et al v. Sheriff of Columbia County et al
as 1:2009cv00374
Plaintiff:
Harold F. Dedrick, Sr. and Marion Dedrick
Defendant:
Sheriff of Columbia County, David W. Harrison, Jr., Brian Molinski and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrison v. Fischer et al
as 9:2008cv01327
Plaintiff:
Edward Harrison
Defendant:
B. Fischer, Yelich, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrison v. Fischer et al
as 9:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Royal Harrison
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lape and A. Paolano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. County of Columbia et al
as 1:2007cv00675
Plaintiff:
Rosann King
Defendant:
County of Columbia, David W. Harrison, Jr., Karen McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Kikendall
as 9:2007cv00178
Petitioner:
Damion Harrison
Respondent:
Paul Kikendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
