Cases 41 - 50 of 76
HARRISON v. SCI FOREST STAFF
as 1:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. HARRISON
Defendant:
SCI FOREST STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02458
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HARRISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00520
Petitioner:
DAMEON HARRISON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VALLE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS et al
as 2:2016cv01811
Petitioner:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY CO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOHN TOWNSON DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKING v. D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL et al
as 3:2015cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DION BROOKING
Defendant:
D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL, Zobitne, Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS et al
as 2:2015cv05267
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, MENSAH M. DEAN, H.F. GERRY LENFEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKING v. D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL et al
as 2:2015cv04767
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DION BROOKING
Defendant:
D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL, ZOBITNE, HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Warden of F.C.I. Schuylkill
as 4:2014cv00942
Petitioner:
Eric J. Harrison
Respondent:
Warden of F.C.I. Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRISON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv02114
Petitioner:
BASHEER HARRISON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. USA
as 1:2014cv00087
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
HARRISON ARNELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
