Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wright et al v. Housing Authority of the City of Hartford et al
as 3:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
William Wright, Maria Del Rosario Perez, JOHNESHA Harrison and others
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Hartford, Executive Director ANNETTE SANDERSON and Annette Sanderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Lopez v. Groman et al
as 3:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Ramon Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
Paul Groman, Mike Brasch, Dennis Daigneault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Barnes v. . Premier Education Group Lp et al
as 3:2019cv01863
Defendant:
Judicial District of New Britain, Anita Zakrezewski, Sheila A. Huddleston and others
Plaintiff:
Charlton Barnes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmura v. Florida et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
State of Florida, 12th Circuit Sarasota County Court, Venice Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKitty et al v. Hudson City Savings Bank et al
as 3:2017cv01845
Plaintiff:
Vincent McKitty and Chevonne McKitty
Defendant:
Hudson City Savings Bank , Bendett & McHugh, P.C. and Amy Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Tyus v. Newton et al
as 3:2013cv01726
Plaintiff:
Gerjuan Tyus
Defendant:
Roger Newton , City of New London , County of New London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
