Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HARRIS v. SEGAL et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR VAUGHN HARRIS
Defendant:
HONORABLE JUDGE ROBERT SEGAL, CLARISSA HARRELL, PHIL ARCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGINS et al v. HUHTAMAKI OYJ et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
SAPPI NORTH AMERICA INC, HUHTAMAKI OYJ, HUHTAMAKI INC and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE HIGGINS, PENELOPE HIGGINS, ASHLEY GOOLDRUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRASIER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2021cv00118
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
HARRY E BRASIER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DYER v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
MICHAEL R PENCE, KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R DYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALPINE v. HARRIS
as 2:2020cv00114
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALPINE
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Defendant:
TERRY SCOTT DRAKE, JOSHUA BLACK, JOE MANNING and others
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. MCINTIRE
as 2:2019cv00301
Defendant:
BRETT A MCINTIRE
Interested Party:
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC and HARRY E INMAN, JR
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAPLUME v. HARRIS AND HARRIS LTD
as 2:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DEREK LAPLUME
Defendant:
HARRIS AND HARRIS LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS v. RING et al
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
ERIC HARRIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM RING and YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
