Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harry Campbell, III v. Anne Precythe
as 21-2634
Petitioner / Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Director
Campbell v. Precythe
as 2:2021cv04044
Petitioner:
Harry G Campbell, III
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harry Campbell, III v. Alan Bagby
as 16-3576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant:
Terry Pittman, Lieutenant, Henry Osuagwu, Correctional Officer, Ronnie D. Rahe, Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Alan Bagby, Director of Health Services Unit
Harry Campbell, III v. Mike Sharp, et al
as 16-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Sharp, Jackson County Sheriff, Jane Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff, John Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff and others
Campbell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Mike Sharp, Jane Doe # 1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Campbell, III v. Michael Mihm
as 15-1960
Petitioner:
HARRY G. CAMPBELL, III
Respondent:
MICHAEL M. MIHM
Party-in-Interest:
RICARDO RIOS, Warden, PAT QUINN, TAMMY GIRARD and others
Harry Campbell, III v. Terry Pittman, et al
as 14-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Terry Pittman, Lieutenant, Henry Osuagwu, Correctional Officer, Ronnie D. Rahe, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
Alan Bagby, Director of Health Services Unit
Campbell vs. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01314
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Harry Campbell, III v. Ricardo Rios, et al
as 13-2382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY G. CAMPBELL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
RICARDO RIOS, Warden, PAT QUINN, TAMMY GIRARD and others
Harry Campbell, III v. Jeff Norman
as 13-2271
Petitioner - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeff Norman, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
