Cases 31 - 40 of 319
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03021
Plaintiff:
Terence L. Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Gwynne E. Birzer, Eric F. Melgren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hart v. Hatch et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Tim Hatch, Robin Borne and Central New Mexico Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Valdez et al
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Jones and Nicholas Kazarinoff
Defendant:
Richard Valdez, Richard (I) Valdez, Derek Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Curry County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Curry County Adult Detention Center, Central New Mexico Corrections Facility, Albuquerque Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv03315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hart
Defendant:
State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and Audrey Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. Fairfield (Hotel)
as 2:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Fairfield (Hotel)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Lil Caesars
as 2:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Lil Caesars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Transition for Living
as 2:2021cv01137
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Transition for Living
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Foot Locker Corporation
as 2:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Foot Locker Corporation, Dick Johnson, Rick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Walmart et al
as 2:2021cv01107
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Walmart, Walmart Corporation and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
