Cases 21 - 30 of 315
Purvis et al v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Ms. LaTonya Purvis, Infant R. J. and John and Jane Doe Police Officers1-10
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Suffolk County Police Department, Geraldine Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
William Henry Hart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Smith v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09808
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Hart v. S & S Worldwide, Inc.
as 2:2022cv07008
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hart
Defendant:
S & S Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Joseph v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv09670
Plaintiff:
Jose J Joseph
Defendant:
City of New York, John B Hart, Marlon O Larin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrell v. Uhler et al
as 9:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop, S. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Reginald Bishop, Hill, Vesenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Dell v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09212
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint A. Lane, Bob Farrell and others
Hart v. Jaypro Sports, LLC.
as 2:2022cv06070
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hart
Defendant:
Jaypro Sports, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
